Go to Collaborative Learning Go to FLAG Home Go to Search
Go to Learning Through Technology Go to Site Map
Go to Who We Are
Go to College Level One Home
Go to Introduction Go to Assessment Primer Go to Matching CATs to Goals Go to Classroom Assessment Techniques Go To Tools Go to Resources




Go to CATs overview
Go to Attitude survey
Go to ConcepTests
Go to Concept mapping
Go to Conceptual diagnostic tests
Go to Interviews
Go to Mathematical thinking
Go to Fault finding and fixing CAT
Go to Plausible estimation CAT
Go to Creating measures CAT
Go to Convincing and proving CAT
Go to Reasoning from evidence CAT
Go to Performance assessment
Go to Portfolios
Go to Scoring rubrics
Go to Student assessment of learning gains (SALG)
Go to Weekly reports


Mathematical Thinking CATs || Fault Finding and Fixing || Plausible Estimation
Creating Measures || Convincing and Proving || Reasoning from Evidence

Go to previous page

Classroom Assessment Techniques
'Plausible Estimation' Tasks

(Screen 4 of 4)
Go to next page

Variations
The tasks included in this site can be
downloaded and used without modification. If you choose to develop your own 'Plausible Estimation' task, you can follow the pattern used in these tools.

  • First, select a question whose quantitative answer you can look up in a reference manual (as a check against the students' answers), and which can be derived from fairly simple assumptions or estimates. If the solution process needs a little-known estimate, provide that to the students.

  • Then, ask the students to estimate the value, placing an emphasis on their assumptions and chain of reasoning.
An extension to Plausible Estimation tasks is to ask for 'bounded estimates' - what range of values would you give in order to be pretty certain that you have included the true value being estimated? One approach is to consider the effects of taking lower and upper bounds on every estimate made in the calculation, and to see the effects on the final estimate. In the bathtub problem, for example, you could explore the effect on the final estimate of smaller and larger tubs, and smaller and larger liquid intake. Asking about the sensitivity of solutions to initial assumptions is an important thinking skill in science.

The following examples from various disciplines may provide some insight into creating your own variations.

Discipline
Example "Plausible Estimation" task
Astronomy
  • How many stars are visible to the naked eye in the entire sky?
  • Biology
  • How many raccoons are killed by cars in the US each year?
  • How many corn kernels are in an acre of corn?
  • How many fish are in a nearby lake?
  • How many geese migrate through your city each fall?
  • Chemistry
  • How many atoms in a grain of sand?
  • How high is a stack of pennies if it's one mole's (6 x 1023) worth?
  • How many oxygen molecules are present in the air in this room?
  • Suppose that your great, great, great grandmother poured a glass of water into the Atlantic Ocean. Suppose that you dip a glass of water from the ocean tomorrow. How many molecules from the first glass of water are in the second glass of water?

  • Analysis
    Student work can be measured against three criteria:

    Category of performance
    Typical response
    The student needs significant instruction Student is unable to design a reasonable chain of operations.
    The student needs some instruction Student designs a reasonable chain of operations with the desired results, although there can be computational errors. There may be no attempt to round the results to fit the significant digits of the answer, and the answer may be given without units.
    The student's work needs to be revised Student designs a reasonable chain of operations, and reaches desired results with minimal computational errors and appropriate precision. Assumptions are communicated, but may need to be expanded or clarified.
    The student's work meets the essential demands of the task Student designs a computational strategy that logically estimates the desired quantity from the given information. The reasonableness of the computed estimate is ascertained, and the assumptions upon which the estimate is based are clearly communicated.

    Go to previous page Go to next page


    Tell me more about this technique:


    Mathematical Thinking CATs || Fault Finding and Fixing || Plausible Estimation
    Creating Measures || Convincing and Proving || Reasoning from Evidence


    Got to the top of the page.



    Introduction || Assessment Primer || Matching Goals to CATs || CATs || Tools || Resources

    Search || Who We Are || Site Map || Meet the CL-1 Team || WebMaster || Copyright || Download
    College Level One (CL-1) Home || Collaborative Learning || FLAG || Learning Through Technology || NISE